mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit

#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit how to#
#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit for mac os#
#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit install#
#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit update#
#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit code#

Of course, this backup repository is not the one from which developers pull the new changes.

#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit how to#

Next, I have no idea how to push to a different branch.įor instance, a developer works in the default branch and wishes to backup its local commits to the special backup repository shared by all the other devs. What I really meant by REV is BRANCH, so the options should read: Of course, I do not mean push -fr REV URL.

#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit for mac os#

For Mac OS X, our preferred method is to use the MacPorts or Darwin Ports environment.

#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit install#

Due to path length limitations on Windows, you may also want to install the Win32LongFileNamesExtension. I have now realized that my question exposes my total misunderstanding of the push command. For MS Windows, we recommend to use the all in one tortoise bundle provided to you by Selenic. I do not have much experience with Mercurial, so I find it really hard to decide which option is the best. Unlike a centralized SCM, this operation is a local operation. REV = default, same URL for all - All developers back their local commits into the default branch of the same backup repository. Commit changes to the given files into the repository.REV per dev, same URL for all - Each developer is given a dedicated branch within the same backup repository.REV = default, URL per dev - Each developer is given a dedicated backup repository.So, the question is about REV and URL, namely I see the following options for them: I tend to provide a special backup script, which would do something like this: hg push -fr REV URLĪs you can see, I am OK with having multiple heads in the backup repository, unless you convince me otherwise.

#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit update#

Without adding pre-commit hooks on the client side to automatically update the referenced revisions of the external subrepositories, it is.

It should be relatively painless to restore the commits from the backup. Recursive commits out of the root repository into all subrepositories as provided by Mercurial, is partially implemented in the current development snapshot of version 1.8 (see this comment on a Bug report.

This is expected to happen rather rarely. If you have branch names that don’t convert to Git, or if you want the author information converted, there are ways to do this, just check out the Fast Export Documentation.

These steps should work for a straightforward Mercurial repository.

Backed commits are never pulled, except when the particular developer loses its yet unpushed work. You may want to make a small local edit, then commit and push it to test it’s all working.

Developers wish to backup their local commits.

Developers pull revisions, work on them, make local commits, push back to the shared repository.

Shared Mercurial repository residing on a dedicated server, which is continuously backed up.

Any other dependencies are not welcomed.We are migrating from SVN to Mercurial and this question has arised practically from day one. It was already a fight to get Mercurial deployed. I am on Windows so installing anything except TortoiseHG should not be required. I can configure it manually - it is one time job. It should not be possible to push into global repository commit that are not validating. For local repository I need a way to distribute validation script. Nevertheless, if you wanted to understand what happens under the hood, see the Handling repository events with hooks chapter from the Mercurial: The Definitive Guide book. To be double safe I need similar validation on my global repository. What are all steps required to validate commit message with set of regular expressions We want to work in semi-centralized set-up so I need a solution for the developer clone (local repository) and for our central clone (global repository).I read about Mercurial Hooks but I am a little bit lost how to put all things together. The hook scripts that are auto-generated by Better Commit Policy can be easily installed into Mercurial repositories, and the app guides you through the process. It would be done as a part of our PrepareEnvironement.bat script that we run anyway on each clean clone.

#Mercurial windows hook to check comment on local commit code#

I know that hooks do not propagate when cloning so I need to a way to 'enable' them in each fresh clone. A Git hook automatically invoked by git commit, and most other commit creation tools such as git citool or git gui.The Gerrit Code Review supplied implementation of this hook is a short shell script which automatically inserts a globally unique Change-Id tag in the footer of a commit message. I read about Mercurial Hooks but I am a little bit lost how to put all things together.įor local repository I need a way to distribute validation script across my developers. We want to work in semi-centralized set-up so I need a solution for the developer clone ( local repository) and for our central clone ( global repository). What are all steps required to validate commit message with set of regular expressions?